Wer Geschichte nicht kennt, wird die Gegenwart nicht verstehen und die Zukunft nicht gestalten können
Thoughts on the question what has Mrs Merkel to do with the downfall of Germany and the Ukraine conflict?
Who is Angela Merkel - former Federal Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany - today only called Germany.
An article from the WELT provides information on this or sets a first acknowledgment mark
https://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/article114407379/Kanzlerin-Angela-Merkel-ist-zu-einem-Viertel-Polin.html
Her mother Herlind Kasner was born in 1928, her father Horst Kasner in 1926.
Angela Merkel, née Kasner, would almost have been called Angela Kazmierczak by her birth name - if her Polish grandfather Ludwik Kazmierczak had not changed his name to "Kasner" in 1930.
This Ludwik Kazmierczak came from Poznań once fought against the German Empire and was later a German policeman of Polish descent in Berlin, then already under the name Ludwig Kasner.
https://www.n-tv.de/panorama/Merkels-Opa-kaempfte-gegen-Deutsche-Die-Wurzeln-der-Aniola-Kazmierczak-article10353776.html
The ancestors can be traced back to https://minakowski.pl/przodkowie-angeli-merkel-odrabiali-panszyczne-u-przodkow-szwagra-hanny-suchockiej/ .
This is only the possible background of Mrs Merkel, which possibly allows an insight into the way of thinking of the former Chancellor.
If you try to question the lady’s story, you will come across some contradictions, it comes from a pastor’s family. The family came from Hamburg, also had Polish roots, some also speak of Jewish on the mother’s side, which, however, can obviously be evidenced in no way as explained above.
She was born in Hamburg and shortly after her birth in 1954 the family moved to the GDR. Since his grandfather lived in Berlin Pankow (East Berlin) until his death in 1959, it is assumed that this was one of the reasons why the family moved from Hamburg to the GDR. Hamburg was and still is regarded as a stronghold of the KPD simplified the Red, her father by profession pastor probably had the nickname of the red Kasner. So she grew up in a church family.
Angela goes to school in the GDR engaged in the FDJ - Agit & Prop - goes to the then EOS today high school, studies and is even rewarded as a child of a pastor with a study in the USSR. Here is a link to the lighting of GDR studies in the SU
https://isem.susu.ru/archen/DDR_de/
The place of study in the Soviet Union is not quite clear, some speak of Moscow others of Donetsk. Why does she still refuse her file (Stasi) today, when she was as critical of the system as she is.
Now we come to the time after 89 - former Greens certify that Merkel wanted to join the Greens, but just at the top - was rejected and then switched to the CDU.
There like phoenix from the ashes to Helmut Kohl girls, who then had to teach her table manners.
https://www.cicero.de/innenpolitik/bundeskanzlerin-angela-merkel-helmut-kohl-1991-cdu
First a career in the GDR more obscured, not so in the foreground and then after 89 in the foreground but looked down from above. It is therefore possible that her family history and this girl who has been traded from above were the reasons for the pictorial spoken knife in the back of Kohl and his men in connection with the donation affair. True to the motto, I am not resentful, but I do not forget anything.
I always remember the humour of Erich Honecker placing it as his last revenge. When she then got the power, first as CDU chairman, then as chancellor she bit all CDU grandes away, a good example is the current CDU boss Merz, who stood in her way or. could become dangerous and brought the ship Germany gradually on descent with known exit.
Now the question she managed all this alone or she was managed - see Klaus Schwab ??? - Global Leaders of Tomorrow the forerunner of today’s Young Global Leaders
https://www.business-leaders.net/wef-young-global-leaders-die-liste-der-deutschen-teilnehmer/
GERMAN PARTICIPANTS OF THE LAST YEARS - WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM
German participants from recent years (page 10 - The Young Leaders Programmes of Atlantik-Brücke and World Economic Forum):
Richard Burt (former US Ambassador) - Karl-Theodor Freiherr zu Guttenberg - Wolfgang Ischinger - Claus Kleber - Julia Klöckner - Silvana Koch-Mehrin - Thomas de Maizière - Ingrid Matthäus-Maier - Angela Merkel - Frank-MehrinWalter Steinmeier - Olaf Scholz - Wolfgang Schäuble - Omid Nouripour - Robert Habeck - Cem Özdemir - Armin Laschet - Markus Rosberg - Cardinal Jens Spahn - Winfried Kretschmann - Volker Bouffier - Jens Weidmann - Nico Rosberg - Cardinal Sandra Marx
If you look at the decisions of Mrs Merkel, as a minister and then as chancellor, you ask yourself, has this woman ever believed in her oath that she took as chancellor?
15.03.2011 Exit from nuclear power - together with Olaf Scholz (current Federal Chancellor)
In 2015, it opens the borders, bypassing all laws
Her path as Federal Chancellor is a path of Germany towards the bottom, which the current so-called traffic light government of Germany from SPD Greens and FDP completes. From the very beginning, Mrs Merkel pursued green policy, she was the pioneer of contemporary green policy if one did not know better.
Now the many may not be new, but there are still a few contradictions in the life of the former Federal Chancellor, which amazingly, neither in the German media, nor in the people any attention.
Attention not only to the gesture but to the face of Mrs Merkel
George Friedman on the Chicago Council and his statement on Germany and Russia: "We (USA) have been fighting for over 100 years to prevent cooperation between Russia and Germany because they are the only power that can threaten us, One should always bear in mind the deindustrialization of Germany and thus the EU and the fratricidal war between Russia and Ukraine.
If you read journalists today but also many commentators, you ask yourself, where have they lived the last few years? According to them, the story in Europe started in Ukraine in 2022.
The deindustralisation of Germany is closely linked to that of the EU, which is why Germany is the EU’s largest net contributor. If German industry dies or emigrates to the USA or Asia, especially to China, the EU will no longer receive money from Germany. Germany’s debt has risen by around 500 billion euros since the traffic light government. France is 111%, Italy 145%, GB 103% and the USA 122%.
https://www.wikiwand.com/de/Liste_der_L%C3%A4nder_nach_Staatsschuldenquote
Since the financial and economic crisis in 2008, the financial system, which is dominated by the USA, has continued to decline. If you talk about the deep state today - nobody smiles at today after the appearance of the current US President Biden - you should recognize that there have been people who knew that we can only save the system in one way. The increasingly strong Germany with its cheap energy resources from Russia is the greatest danger for us. We will not be able to attack Russia itself, but we can bring our vassals Germany to their knees with impunity. See "The Only World Power: America’s Strategy of Domination is the German title of a geopolitical treatise Zbigniew Brzeziński" - quote:" The USA his vassals and tributary countries"
At the latest since the commissioning of Nordstream 1, the USA first tried to prevent the construction, then the commissioning. Now even Nordstream 2 was built. What many do not know is now a fact that Ukraine also used unauthorized without paying. Furthermore, Ukraine had gas debts. Just as Russia supplied Ukraine long after 2014 - the coup - it also supplied Europe. It was not Russia that stopped deliveries, as Federal Economics Minister Habeck and Kanzker Scholz have done today. but Germany rejected it. The turbine, which was in Canada - service provider for Gazprom - for repair and service, was first delivered to Germany and then to Russia without corresponding documents. Why? The US sanctions policy. Amazingly, Mrs Merkel had understood how to "prevent" this policy of sanctions in its time in the dimensions despite the alleged annexation of Crimea. Of course, you can discuss the way, but in the German language
Annexation - The word annexation (the) denotes the violent and unlawful appropriation or appropriation. Possession of a foreign (state) territory or country by a foreign nation.
At the time of the League of Nations - the forerunner of today’s UN - there was the concept of the right of peoples to self-determination. This was already interpreted in the interest of the French and British, one looks at the area separations after the First World War from Germany, how they placed German territories under Polish supervision and Poland incorporated these territories and harassed the minorities, which is a fact that only pions dispute. The best example is the city of Gdansk. In the first war after the Second World War in Europe, more precisely Yugoslavia, which journalists, politicians and many commentators forget, international law was also trampled on by the West and NATO. The problems have not yet been definitively resolved - see Kosovo, according to international law belongs to Serbia, successor state of Yugoslavia. Abe rich digress away.
In a newspaper interview published in March 2024, Polish Foreign Minister Radosław Sikorski claimed that the US knew about the impending demolition of the Nord Stream pipeline in 2022 and did nothing about it. There is "so" a lot to be thankful for in the USA, says Sikorski. By the way, this is the same Sikoski who thanked the US today after the explosion on Twitter X, later deleted.
In the course of the events of 2013/14 in Ukraine, the Minsk agreements were also included in UN Resolution 2202. Within the framework of this agreement, agreements were reached between the government in Kiev and the republics of Donetsk and Luhanzk, with Germany, France and Russia acting as guarantee states. What then led the German French British and the US to make demands on Russia as if they were involved in the above agreements, which was definitely not so.
The reasons why Russia finally invaded Ukraine are known and even if the West does not want to hear it, sin the same or strongly similar reason that the West brought out for the bombing of Yugoslavia, also there was in fact a civil war. Former Federal Chancellor Schröder later confirmed the war of aggression against Yugoslavia in violation of international law and thus an admission that Germany violated the 2+4 Treaty.
The former German Chancellor confirmed Dec. 2022 Minsk II / UN Resolution 2202 should only serve to give Ukraine for rearmament - I simply add it to those concerned with German jobs, because after all, every means is right. Just like during the time of Helmut Kohl and the war between Iraq and Iran. The whole thing was still crowned because the former French President Hollande and the former Ukrainian President Poroshenko confirmed Mrs Merkel’s statements. So who is responsible for the SVO?
Let’s come to the interview of Ms Merkel with the time on 7.12.2022
https://www.zeit.de/2022/51/angela-merkel-russland-fluechtlingskrise-bundeskanzler/komplettansicht
„And the 2014 Minsk Agreement was an attempt to give Ukraine time, and it also used that time to become stronger, as we see today. Ukraine of 2014/15 is not the Ukraine of today. As seen in the battle for Debaltseve (railway town in Donbass, Donetsk Oblast, ed.) in early 2015, Putin could easily have overrun it at that time. And I very much doubt that the NATO states could have done as much as they do today to help Ukraine."
We should also have in mind the plane crash NH17 in Ukraine.
A very good description of the backgrounds that play an important role in the run-up to the downing of MH17 is the book:
"The launch: flight MH17, Ukraine and the new Cold War
Paperback - August 30, 2018 by Kees van der Pijl (Author), Jochen Mitschka (Translator) "
How manipulated and lied was that the bars bend we can also see the following example.Let’s look at a speculation, which seems just as plausible.
https://telegra.ph/GermanWings-9525-Terroranschlag-2015-03-24
You ask yourself, Nordstream detonation can allegedly not be cleared, although the Baltic Sea is the best monitored area, probably worldwide, but if a plane crashes, whether MH 17 - that was the Russians or GermanWings 9525 that was the co-pilot, you know the culprit in no time. Just like they tried to make the Russians liable at Nordstream I + II.
Then there was the eternal dispute about the 2% goal of NATO."For years there was a dispute, did Mrs Merkel also thwart this? This is not very credible, because it does not fit the statement in the interview the time Dec 22 to Minsk II. On the one hand, it wants to buy time for Ukraine so that it can rearm itself accordingly and in return I prevent the rearmament of Germany and thus of the europ. Part of NATO?
So if it was managed by other forces - keyword Seehofer and his statement on "Those who decide are not elected, and those who are elected have nothing to decide" - then these managers were subject to a complete miscalculation?
Anyone who can count to 3 would not only give another time to arm themselves militarily, but also equip themselves. Because when the upgraded turns at once, I have a problem myself. This thought was also expressed once after 24.2.22 by a Ukrainian, when it was about too few arms supplies of NATO, analogously when we unite with RF and Belarus and then march against Europe.
Somehow reminded me of Bin Laden, who was first prepared and upgraded by the USA to turn against his master.
So what was actually planned, when, where and why, and who were the participants in the plan?
The role of Putin who speaks German and Mrs Merkel Russian does not bring clarity.
Therefore in this context a reader’s comment on Anti-Spiegel
SchweigenIstGold says:
"9 December 2022 at 19:30
This is the first time in my life that I feel like Putin is lying.
The Minsk Treaty - everyone who read military reports from the Donbas on a daily basis at the time - was basically a capitulation of Ukraine. Somewhere there were a few thousand Ukrainian soldiers and/or mercenaries encircled in one place, and it was about the fact that Poroshenko (and the EU countries supporting him) had to prevent at all costs, that the seperatists are simply slaughtered. Not that I believe that Poroshenko would have given even a single FUCK to human life, but it would have cost him his head back in the country, as he (like a few years later Selinski) had started with the promise to end the war.
I can still remember the press reports on the Minsk negotiations: Already from the body language of the actors (Putin and Lukashenko on the one hand, Poroshenko, Merkel and Hollande on the other) one could already read, who was in a strong and weak negotiating position. And anyone who took the trouble to read this treaty and compare it with the real circumstances in the country knew: All that Poroshenko signed there, he gets internally politically against the hardliners of the Nazi faction (so ASOV and so on) and the hardliners in the Pentagon (Obama/Biden administration). For everyone it was completely clear that this contract was not worth the paper on which it was written.
Then why the whole game?
BOTH sides wanted to gain time. No one had the illusion that even a single point of this agreement would be implemented by the Ukrainian government. Everyone expected that in a year or two it would continue militarily down there.
The Russians, however, knew a few more things: First, that the war would not be limited to Ukraine, but in principle NATO stood against Russia at that time. And secondly, that the Russian army was not yet far enough to win such a war. Every year that this war (which the US wanted to wage anyway) was delayed, Russia’s chances of winning it increased. The Russian intervention in Syria in 2015 was basically a gigantic maneuver in preparation for this war, and at the same time the development of new Russian weapons was advanced at maximum speed.
Each year delay of this war has increased the probability of a Russian victory. The fact that Russia has actually won 8 full years was partly due to the fact that the hands of the Pentagon were tied in Trump’s four years in office. Had Hillary Clinton become president in 2016, the war in Ukraine would probably have resumed in 2017 or 2018 (and won by NATO). That was NATO’s original plan, and that is precisely why so many people in the US were angry with Trump and accused him of being brought to power by Putin.
So why is Putin lying?
Merkel made the mistake of admitting that she lied at the time and never intended to call on Poroshenko to comply with the treaty, but from the very beginning of planning to wage war against Russia again as soon as possible. This will eventually lead to criminal proceedings against them (No peace treaty, but only armistice pipapo ...). Putin would be stupid if he would now throw her out by the official statement that he had already seen through her then game.
So now he just plays the surprised one ..."
https://www.anti-spiegel.ru/2022/putins-reaktion-auf-merkel-interview-wir-haetten-die-militaeroperation-frueher-beginnen-sollen/
The real masterminds in the USA - also called Deep State - knew that they could not cope with the nuclear power Russia, not that they had not played through this, but they knew that the USA, unlike in the 2 World War, can not get away unscathed.
The strategy of the Cold War that third countries - at that time used by both sides - for their own interests, currently revives again in Ukraine but also in Yemen, even the Gaza, Lebanon and Israel conflict. The latter is a conflict of the Empire power of Great Britain already passed by the old today
https://www.wikiwand.com/de/Geschichte_des_Staates_Israel
with the founding of the State of Israel in 1948 the seeds were laid.
As we see, many factors from history play a role today when we look at the Ukraine conflict and the deindustrialization of Germany and the EU. The sanctions policy that the USA imposes on the EU in particular hardly harms the USA, but very well the EU in particular Germany.
Finally, it is my first attempt and I would be happy if the readers help me with constructive criticism to improve. Maybe I am not an author, but what is always important to me is the exchange of opinions on an equal footing with other people, because only in this way can we learn from each other and steer our own opinion into constructive paths.
Finally, a quotation, which is valid on a large and a small scale
Helmut Schmidt: »Dear 100 hours
Negotiate for free, than shoot a minute«